Spotting Predatory Journals: A review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52751/cmujs.2024.v28i2.b5xhb546Keywords:
Predatory Journals, Scholarly Integrity, Peer Review, Academic Publishing, Journal Evaluation.Abstract
This research paper seeks to investigate the rise of predatory journals, which undermine scholarly and research efforts. Predatory journals falsely present themselves as legitimate scientific publications, deviating from established peer-review processes and ethical standards. They often exploit scholars and researchers through excessive publication fees, lacking adequate quality control or a rigorous review process. Overlooking such malpractice in the academic sphere can compromise the quality of knowledge disseminated to the audience. Urgent action is required to identify and halt potential predatory journals. This paper emphasizes the crucial consideration for scholars and researchers to carefully assess journals before submitting their work, aiming to avoid falling victim to academic predators. Additionally, the paper addresses key themes for spotting predatory journals, including (1) Peer-reviewed Policy, (2) Article Processing Charges, (3) Indexing, (4) Spamming and Solicitation, (5) Editorial Policy, and (6) Lack of Rigor and Scrutiny. The research employs an archival research method, involving the retrieval and analysis of information from original archives, to accomplish these objectives.
Downloads
References
Adnan, A., Anwar, S., Zia, T., Razzaq, S., Maqboo, F., & Rehman, Z.U. (2019). Beyond Beall’s blacklist: Automatic detection of open access predatory research journals. In 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communication, 1692-1697.
Angadi, P.V., & Kaur, H. (2020). Research integrity at risk: Predatory journals are growing threat. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 23 (2), 113-116.
Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. (2019). A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations. Research Policy, 48(2), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.013
Balehegn, M. (2017). Increased publication in predatory journals by developing Countries’ institutions: What it entails? And what can be done? International Information & Library Review, 49(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1278188
Beall, J. (2016). Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals. International Higher Education, (86), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2016.86.9358
Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica. (2), 273–278. Doi: 10.11613/bm.2077.029 [PMC free article] [PubMed
Bell, K., Kingori, P., & Mills, D. (2024). Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 49(1), 78-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439221112463
Bowman, J. (2014). Predatory publishing, questionable peer review and fraudulent conferences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78 (10), 1-6.
Brenna, C. (2023). Archival research. Varieties of Qualitative Research Method, Selected Contextual Perspective, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_6
Burggren, W. & Madasu, D. K. & Hawkins, K. S. & Halbert, M., (2018) “Marketing via Email Solicitation by Predatory (and Legitimate) Journals: An Evaluation of Quality, Frequency and Relevance”, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 6(1), eP2246. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2246
Callaghan, C. W., & Nicholson, D. R. (2020). Predatory publishing and predatory journals: A critical review and proposed research agenda for higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), 1433–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1695762
Cukier, S., Helal, L., Rice, D.B., Pupkaite, J., Ahmadzai, N., Wislon, M., Skidmore, B., Lalu, M.M., & Moher, D. (2020). Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: A systematic review. BMC Medicine, 18, 1-20.
Da Silva, J., Dobranszki, J., Tsigaris, P., & Al-Khatib, A. (2019). Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianships, 45 (6), 1-5. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071
Demir, S. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal Informetrics, 12 (4), 1296-1311. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008
Dobusch, L., & Heimstädt, M. (2019). Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review. Management Learning, 50(5), 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619878820
Dony, C., Raskinet, M., Renaville, F., Simon, S., & Thirion, P. (2020). How reliable and useful is Cabell’s blacklist? A data-driven analysis. LIBER Quarterly, 30(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10339
Duc, N., Hiep, D., & Thong, P. (2020). Predatory open access journals are indexed in reputable database: A revisiting issue or an unsolved problem. MedArch, 74 (4), 318-322.
Elmore, S. A., & Weston, E. H. (2020). Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them. Toxicologic pathology, 48(4), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623320920209
Ferris, L., & Winker, M. (2017). Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Biochemia Media, 27(2), 279-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.030.
Forero, D., Oermann, M., Manca, A., Deriu, F., Zeron, H., Dadkhah, M., Bhad, R., Deshpande, S., Wang, W., & Cifuentes, M. (2018). Negative effects of “predatory” journal on global health research. Ubiquity Press, 84 (4), 584-589. DOI: 10.29024/aogh.2389
Frandsen, T. (2022). Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of scopus articles. Learned Publishing, 35 (4), 598-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1409
Gaillet, L. L. (2012). (Per)Forming Archival Research Methodologies. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 35–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23264916
Garcia, M. (2019). Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity. An Pediatr, 90 (1), 57.e1 – 57 e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.11.003
Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K.D., Bryson, G.L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., et. Al. (2019). Predatory journals; no definition, no defence. Nature. 576, 201-212.
Happe L. E. (2020). Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 26(8), 956–960. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.956
Heller, M. (2023). Rethinking Historical Methods in Organization Studies: Organizational Source Criticism. Organization Studies, 44(6), 987-1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231156978
Kendall, G., & Linacre, S. (2022). Predatory journals: Revisiting Beall’s research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38, 530-543. https//doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09888-z
Koerber, A., Starkey, J. C., Ardon-Dryer, K., Cummins, R. G., Eko, L., & Kee, K. F. (2020). A qualitative content analysis of watchlists vs safelists: How do they address the issue of predatory publishing? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(6), 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102236
Kumar, M.J. (2022). Beware of predatory journals. IETE Technical Review, 39 (4), 735-736. DOI: 10.1080/025602.2022.2132712
Kratochvíl, J., Plch, L., Sebera, M., & Koriťáková, E. (2020). Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view. Learned Publishing, 33(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1299
Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E. (2021a). How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall’s lists of predatory journals on academic publishing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271
Lopez & Christine S. Gaspard (2020) Predatory Publishing and the Academic Librarian: Developing Tools to Make Decisions, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 39:1, 1-14, DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1693205
Mathew, R. P., Patel, V., & Low, G., Associate Clinical Professor (2022). Predatory Journals- The Power of the Predator Versus the Integrity of the Honest. Current problems in diagnostic radiology, 51(5), 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.07.005
Marydee Ojala, Regina Reynolds & Kay G. Johnson (2020) Predatory Journal Challenges and Responses, The Serials Librarian, 78:1-4, 98-103, DOI: 10.1080/0361526X.2020.1722894
McQuarrie, F. A. E., Kondra, A. Z., & Lamertz, K. (2020). Do tenure and promotion policies discourage publications in predatory journals? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.3.01
Metilda, M., Pinto, A., & Pachiyappan, S. (2023). Article processing charges and their impact in open access publishing. 330-341. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9805-4.ch016
Mohr, J., & Ventresca, M. (2002). Archival research methods. Blackwell Publishers, DOI: 10.1002/9781405164061.ch35
Mudry, A., & Ruben, RJ. (2019). The fox and the crow: Predatory open access journals in otolaryngology. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 161 (2), 193-194. DOI: 10.1177/0194599838756
Munn, Z., Barker, T., Stern, C., Pollock, D., Ross-White, A., Klugar, M., Wiechula, R., Aromataris, E., & Shamseer, L. (2021). Should I include studies from “predatory” journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers. JBI evidence synthesis, 19(8), 1915–1923.
Nnodim, K., & Nwaokoro, JC. (2023). Predatory journals in scientific research: A great chaellenge. Journal of Case Reports in Medical Medicine, 9 (1), 1-4. DOI: 10.56557/JOCRIMS/2023/v9i18135
Padilla, T., Owens, T. (2020). Digital Sources and Digital Archives: Historical Evidence in the Digital Age. International Journal of Digital Humanities 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42803-020-00028-7
Pollock, D., Barker, T., Stone, J., Aromataris, E.,Klugar, M., Scott, A., Stern, C., White, A., Whitehorn, A., Wiechula, R., Shamseer, L., & Munn, Z. (2023). Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study. Research Synthesis Methods, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1684
Pond, B. B., Brown, S. D., Stewart, D. W., Roane, D. S., & Harirforoosh, S. (2019). Faculty applicants’ attempt to inflate CVs using predatory journals. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(1), 7210. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7210
Rice, D.B., Skidmore, B. & Cobey, K.D. (2021). Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 10 (175), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01733-2
Richtig, G., Richtig, E., Böhm, A., Oing, C., Bozorgmehr, F., Kruger, S., Kiesewetter, B., Zielinski, C., & Berghoff, A. S. (2019). Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: Results of an online survey. ESMO Open, 4(6), e000580. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000580
Rivera, H., & Da Silva, J. (2021). Retractions, fake peer reviews, and paper mills. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36 (24), e165. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e165
Samuel, A., & Aranha, V. (2018). Valuable research in fake journals and self-boasting with fake metrics. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences, 13 (4), 517-518. DOI: 10.4103/JPN_66_18
Shrestha, J., Subedi, S., Timsina, K.P., & Tripathi, M. (2018). Risk of publication in worthless journals. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1(1), 1-5.
Siler, K. (2020). Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(11), 1386–1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24339
Siler, K., Vincent-Lamarre, P., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2021). Predatory publishers’ latest scam: Bootlegged and rebranded papers. Nature, 598(7882), 563–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8
Sinner, A. (2013). Archival research as living inquiry: An alternate approach for research in the histories of teacher education. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 36(3), 241-251.
Strong G. (2019). Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals. Journal of human lactation: official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 35(4), 661–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419869912
Suiter, A. M., & Sarli, C. C. (2019). Selecting a Journal for Publication: Criteria to Consider. Missouri medicine, 116(6), 461–465.
Van Noorden R. (2020). Hundreds of scientists have peer-reviewed for predatory journals. Nature, 10.1038/d41586-020-00709-x. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00709-x
Wang, J., Xu, J., & Chen, D. (2021). Chinese PhD students’ perceptions of predatory journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 52(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.52.2.02
White, A., & Wilson, R. (2023). What can be learned about predatory journals from a failed study? Possible motivations behind predatory journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 54 (1), 3-14.
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
Yamada, Y. (2021). How to protect the credibility of articles published in predatory journals. Publications, 9 (4), 1-8. https//doi.org/10.3390/publications9010004
Yildizhan E. (2022). Avoiding Predatory Journals: Four Main Points. Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 59(3), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.28243
