INSET on Teachers’ Performance: Basis for Faculty Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52751/cmujs.2025.v1.w2p9t956Keywords:
INSET training, Performance, Faculty Develoopment ProgramAbstract
Educators are the played a major role in the national economy of every country. Leaders invested trainings and workshops to the educators. In the Philippines, educators simultaneously conducted its annual In-Service Training in every school. The aims of the training is to enhance, improve and recognize up to date teaching pedagogies. With these trainings, teachers develop and practice the necessary skills and knowledge and effectively applies the learned concept and skills in their everyday teaching that will contribute magnanimously in the development of students with a global mindset. Ultimately, the academic achievement of students depends on the quality of the teachers.
This study used the descriptive-correlational method of research design as the dominant design in collecting data from the respondents who assessed the trainings workshops conducted for teachers in selected schools. The teacher respondents answered the survey questionnaire. This design was selected because it allowed for the comprehensive exploration of teacher performance in the context of the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Curriculum. To make it clear and consistent, the researcher proposed a faculty development program. The Professional development such as In-Service Training for Teachers (INSET) of the Department of Education is one of the tools to help improve teaching and learning approaches.
Downloads
References
Culajara, C. J. (2023). Improving teachers’ professional development through School Learning
Action Cell (SLAC). Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 13(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol13.1.6.2023
Fernan Peniero Tupas, Rosario P. Noderama (2020). Looking into In-Service Training for teachers in the Philippines: Are they Gearing towards Education 4.0 Universal Journalof Education Research, 8 (10), 4651-4660. DOI:10.13189/ ujer.2020.081034.
SIENA, J. A. Decentralization and Teacher Professional Development in Large
Education System. Instruction, Teacher Professional Development, and ICT in Basic Education, 3.
Oestar, J. M. Teacher’s Continuing Professional Development in the New Normal: Groundwork for Project META (Monitoring, Evaluation, and Technical Assistance Plan).
Department of Education (2013, September 4). DO 36, S. 2013 – Our department
of education vision, mission and core values (DEPED VMV)
https://www.deped.gov.ph/2013/09/04/do-36-s-2013-our-department-of-education-vision- mission-and core-values-deped-vmv/
Department of Education (2015, February 6). DO 2, S. 2015 – Guidelines on the
establishment and implementation of the results-based performance management system (RPMS) in the department of education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/02/06/do-2-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-establishment-and-implementation-of-the-results-based-performance-management-system-rpms-in-the-department-of-education/
Department of Education (2017, August 11). DepEd ORDER No. 42, s. 2017. National adoption and implementation of the Philippine professional standards for teachers https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2017/08/DO_s2017_042-1.pdf
Department of Education (2018, September 21). RPMS-PPST: Helping teachers improve delivery of quality basic education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2018/10/03/rpms-ppst- helping-teachers-improve-delivery-of-quality-basic-education/
UNESCO (2020, November 26). UNESCO and DepEd launch the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report in the Philippines. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-and-deped-launch-2020-global-education-monitoring-report-philippines www.neda.gov.ph
